From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crowley v. Burke

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
May 21, 1894
38 A. 895 (R.I. 1894)

Opinion

May 21, 1894.

A person from whom money has been stolen is not entitled to sue for the same until complaint for the crime has been made and process issued thereon.

DEFENDANT'S petition for a new trial.

John M. Brennan, for plaintiff.

George J. West, for defendants.


According to the testimony of the plaintiff, the defendant, Mrs. Burke, robbed her of the $135, for which she sues. This being so, Pub. Stat. R.I. cap. 204, § 22, requires that in order to entitle her to sue for the money, she should have first made a complaint for the crime and had process issued on the complaint. This she did not do. The court, therefore, properly directed a verdict for the defendants.

The petition for a new trial is denied and dismissed, and the case remitted to the Common Pleas Division, with direction to enter judgment on the verdict.


Summaries of

Crowley v. Burke

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
May 21, 1894
38 A. 895 (R.I. 1894)
Case details for

Crowley v. Burke

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGET CROWLEY vs. RICHARD BURKE et ux

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: May 21, 1894

Citations

38 A. 895 (R.I. 1894)
20 R.I. 793

Citing Cases

Struthers v. Peckham

In Royce v. Oakes, 20 R.I. 252, a count setting forth facts amounting to larceny was held to be demurrable…

DaCosta v. Rose

The statute, in both its original and present form, explicitly refers to injury resulting from crime or…