From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crowell v. Commonwealth

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 3, 1965
212 N.E.2d 233 (Mass. 1965)

Opinion

December 3, 1965.

The case was submitted on briefs.

Joseph E. Marino for the petitioner.

Warren K. Kaplan, Assistant Attorney General, for the Commonwealth.


Exceptions overruled. The petitioner filed for a writ of error principally alleging that he was not adequately advised of his right to counsel when on January 17, 1962, he pleaded guilty to indictments in the Superior Court charging him with assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and armed robbery. Prior to pleading he had filed a written waiver of his right to counsel under Rule 10 of the General Rules, 337 Mass. 813. The single justice in affirming the judgment found that the signature by the petitioner in the circumstances which obtained at the time when he pleaded guilty was "persuasive, if not conclusive, evidence" of his having reasonably understood, as an individual who had ordinary intelligence and a good deal of prior experience in the courtroom, that he was entitled to counsel.


Summaries of

Crowell v. Commonwealth

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Dec 3, 1965
212 N.E.2d 233 (Mass. 1965)
Case details for

Crowell v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. CROWELL vs. COMMONWEALTH

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Dec 3, 1965

Citations

212 N.E.2d 233 (Mass. 1965)
349 Mass. 776

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Cavanaugh

This inability, even with the aid of consulting counsel, is made abundantly clear by the record. Just as it…