From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crouch v. Guardian Angel Nursing, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 4, 2009
Civil Action No. 3:07-cv-00541 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 4, 2009)

Summary

rejecting reliance on a Tennessee unemployment law decision because "the FLSA is likely broader" than Tennessee law

Summary of this case from Walsh v. Alpha & Omega U.S., Inc.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:07-cv-00541.

November 4, 2009


ORDER


In this action, the named Plaintiffs, all licensed practical nurses ("LPNs"), on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, seek recovery under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") for overtime pay and liquidated damages, among other relief. (See Am. Compl., Doc. No. 41.) Presently before the Court are two motions for partial summary judgment filed by the Plaintiffs. The first (Doc. No. 141) seeks judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs on the issues of (1) whether Plaintiffs are employees of the Defendants rather than independent contractors for purposes of the FLSA, thereby entitling them to overtime pay; and (2) whether under the joint-enterprise and/or operational-control theories any and all Defendants are the Plaintiffs' employers and therefore jointly and severally liable for any damages to Plaintiffs prove they are entitled. The second motion (Doc. No. 182), seeks judgment in Plaintiffs' favor on the questions of (1) whether Defendants must be deemed to have acted with a lack of good faith in failing to comply with the FLSA, such that they will be obligated to pay liquidated damages along whether whatever damages for which they may be liable under the statute; and (2) whether Defendants acted willfully, such that a threeyear statute of limitations applies to the Plaintiffs' claims, rather than the two-year period that would otherwise be applicable.

Approximately thirty-five plaintiffs were named in the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 41) filed on June 27, 2007. Since then, Plaintiffs' counsel have filed a "Consent to Become a Party Plaintiff" for more than one hundred additional LPNs. Plaintiffs' motion to certify a class remains pending but at this point it is unclear whether that motion has been rendered moot.

For the reasons explained in the contemporaneously filed Memorandum Opinion, the Court finds that: (1) Plaintiffs are employees rather than independent contractors for purposes of the FLSA; (2) there are no material issues of disputed fact as to whether Defendants Guardian Angel Nursing, Inc., a Tennessee corporation, Guardian Angel Nursing, Inc, a Mississippi corporation, On-Call Staffing of Tennessee, Inc., On-Call Staffing, Inc. and E.L. Garner, Jr. should be held jointly and severally liable in this case, but material issues of fact preclude judgment as a matter of law as to the joint and several liability of the remaining Defendants, namely Lee Garner, III and Quality Care Home Health Agency, Inc.; (3) based upon the undisputed facts, Defendants cannot show that they acted in good faith in attempting to comply with the FLSA; and (4) based on the undisputed facts, Defendants' violation of the FLSA was willful.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs' first motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 141) is therefore GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, summary judgment as to the joint and several liability of Lee Garner, III and Quality Care Home Health is DENIED but the motion is GRANTED in all other respects. The second motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 182) is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crouch v. Guardian Angel Nursing, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Nov 4, 2009
Civil Action No. 3:07-cv-00541 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 4, 2009)

rejecting reliance on a Tennessee unemployment law decision because "the FLSA is likely broader" than Tennessee law

Summary of this case from Walsh v. Alpha & Omega U.S., Inc.

In Crouch, the court held that the plaintiff's FLSA claim was not governed by a forum selection clause that applied to "any action to enforce any provision of this agreement."

Summary of this case from Sharpe v. Ally Fin., Inc.

In Crouch, for example, the forum selection clause stated, in relevant part, “that any action to enforce any provision of this Agreement” shall be brought in Mississippi.

Summary of this case from Marzano v. Proficio Mortgage Ventures, LLC

In Crouch, as in this case, the defendants were mainly in the business of staffing and providing nurses to patients in need of private duty nursing care. 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103832, at *51.

Summary of this case from Lemaster v. Alt. Healthcare Sols., Inc.
Case details for

Crouch v. Guardian Angel Nursing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUDY CROUCH, CHERYL HUFF, ERIC THREADGILL, REBECCA BLACKBURN, SHAUNA…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:07-cv-00541 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ednacot v. Mesa Med. Grp., PLLC

Moreover, even if we did not hold that the language of § 7422 expressly preempted [plaintiff's] claim, the…

Walsh v. Alpha & Omega U.S., Inc.

Reliance on state unemployment law decisions for FLSA classifications are insufficient. See, e.g., Crouch v.…