From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cronin v. Cronin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1990
158 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 5, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for an award of counsel fees is referred to the trial court.

With respect to the wife's claim for counsel fees pendente lite, we find that the wife established her financial inability to pay (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237; Ahern v Ahern, 94 A.D.2d 53; Palmer v Palmer, 76 A.D.2d 905). However, we find that the award of $20,000 was unwarranted because the wife's counsel failed to provide adequate documentation regarding the services rendered. While counsel's affirmation did set forth certain services performed on the wife's behalf, the handwritten time records provided were, for the most part, illegible (see, Goodson v Goodson, 135 A.D.2d 604; Baecher v Baecher, 80 A.D.2d 629).

Therefore, the matter is referred to the trial court for the purposes of determining the value of the necessary services rendered. Mangano, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cronin v. Cronin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1990
158 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Cronin v. Cronin

Case Details

Full title:SHARON CRONIN, Respondent, v. MICHAEL CRONIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 44

Citing Cases

Mulcahy v. Mulcahy

Moreover, neither the wife nor her counsel established the nature of their relationship or whether a retainer…

Levine v. Levine

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the motion is denied. The…