From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 4, 1990
567 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

In Crews, the trial judge committed the same error, that is he sentenced the defendant as a habitual felony offender on the basis of five convictions occurring on the same day. The district court reversed citing Taylor, supra, but explained that "upon resentencing, the state may be able, and should be given the opportunity, to establish that the defendant qualifies as an habitual offender."

Summary of this case from Doggett v. State

Opinion

No. 89-2467.

October 4, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, Raymond T. McNeal, J.

Daniel E. Crews, Daytona Beach, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


In 1989 the defendant was sentenced as an habitual offender based on five prior felony convictions all entered on November 25, 1987. In 1990, this court, in Taylor v. State, 558 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) held that, to qualify under the habitual offender statute, a second prior felony had to have occurred after conviction for a first prior felony.

If the defendant does not qualify as an habitual offender, the twenty-five year term of incarceration he received would exceed the general statutory maximum for the offense of robbery, a second degree felony, which is fifteen years incarceration. While the defendant was sentenced before Taylor v. State, his appeal was pending at the time Taylor was decided. Therefore, the defendant is entitled to have Taylor applied in this case, to have his sentence vacated, and to have his habitual offender adjudication reconsidered in light of Taylor.

The defendant's scoresheet indicates prior felonies in addition to those entered on November 25, 1987. Therefore, upon resentencing, the State may be able, and should be given the opportunity, to establish that the defendant qualifies as an habitual offender as interpreted in Taylor.

We reverse the habitual offender adjudication and the defendant's sentence as an habitual offender and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB, J., and DANIEL, C.W., Judge, Retired, concur.


Summaries of

Crews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 4, 1990
567 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

In Crews, the trial judge committed the same error, that is he sentenced the defendant as a habitual felony offender on the basis of five convictions occurring on the same day. The district court reversed citing Taylor, supra, but explained that "upon resentencing, the state may be able, and should be given the opportunity, to establish that the defendant qualifies as an habitual offender."

Summary of this case from Doggett v. State
Case details for

Crews v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL E. CREWS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 4, 1990

Citations

567 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. State

He sought to vacate his 1987 habitual offender sentence on two grounds: 1) he was improperly habitualized for…

Doggett v. State

There is no dispute that an error was committed during the initial sentencing hearing. The primary issue on…