From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crespi v. Crespi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

February, 1933.


Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. If the business of the partners was conducted by means of a corporation the plaintiff may not have an accounting. ( Boag v. Thompson, 208 App. Div. 132.) The complaint does not make it clear. A trial will be necessary. Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents on authority of Boag v. Thompson ( supra); Brock v. Poor ( 216 N.Y. 387), and Jackson v. Hooper ( 76 N.J. Eq. 592, 598).


Summaries of

Crespi v. Crespi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Crespi v. Crespi

Case Details

Full title:ELIA R. CRESPI, Respondent, v. JOHN CRESPI and Others, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Weisman v. Awnair Corp. of America

This they may not do for the rule is well settled that a joint venture may not be carried on by individuals…