From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crenshaw v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 13, 2013
106 So. 3d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 4D11–4345.

2013-02-13

Brian CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 562007CF000147B and 562008CF000505A. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 562007CF000147B and 562008CF000505A.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

On Motion for Rehearing


PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing is granted. We withdraw our prior opinion and substitute the following in its place.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's motion for postconviction relief. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a motion to correct an illegal sentence based on the court's failure to continue appellant's youthful offender status upon violation of probation for a crime on which appellant was originally sentenced as a youthful offender. See Christian v. State, 84 So.3d 437, 444–45 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (youthful offender who violates probation is still entitled to be sentenced as a youthful offender on original offense; even though six-year cap may not apply, other aspects of youthful offender sentencing would still apply) ; see also St. Cyr v. State, 106 So.3d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

In Christian, the issue of the youthful offender status came to the court by way of a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800.

St. Cyr also addressed the youthful offender status in a motion to correct an illegal sentence.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crenshaw v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 13, 2013
106 So. 3d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Crenshaw v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brian CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

106 So. 3d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)