From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crenshaw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Apr 1, 2003
101 S.W.3d 343 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81613

April 1, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Joan M. Burger, Judge.

Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, Office B, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Andrea Mazza Follett, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J. and Gary M. Gaertner, Sr. and Kathianne Kraup Crane, JJ.



ORDER


Willie Crenshaw (movant) appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Crenshaw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Apr 1, 2003
101 S.W.3d 343 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Crenshaw v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE CRENSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Apr 1, 2003

Citations

101 S.W.3d 343 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Crenshaw v. Dormire

The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Petitioner's post-conviction motion. Crenshaw v. State,…