From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Creek Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 22, 1912
127 P. 480 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 1853

Opinion Filed October 22, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Review — Sufficiency of Evidence. Where the evidence reasonably tends to support the verdict, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from Creek County Court; Josiah G. Davis, Judge.

Action by James G. Johnson and others against the Creek Bank Trust Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Thompson Smith, for plaintiff in error.

John G. Ellinghausen, for defendants in error.


On July 3, 1908, Jesse Ripley, doing business in Sapulpa, being indebted to the Creek Bank Trust Company, plaintiff in error, in the sum of $1,441.19, executed to it a chattel mortgage on his stock of groceries, two mules, a delivery wagon, and a set of double harness, and on November 17, 1908, the same was duly filed with the register of deeds of Creek county as required by law. On November 21, 1908, after condition broken, the mortgaged property, together with his notes and fixtures, were turned over by Ripley to the mortgagee. Shortly thereafter, defendants in error sued the bank for the amount of their account, alleging that it had assumed the payment of the debt at the time of taking over the mortgaged property, which the bank denied. There was trial to a jury and judgment for plaintiffs before a justice of the peace, and later before the county court to which the case was appealed, and the bank brings the case here. There being evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

There is no merit in the remaining assignments of error.


Summaries of

Creek Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 22, 1912
127 P. 480 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Creek Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:CREEK BANK TRUST CO. v. JOHNSON et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 22, 1912

Citations

127 P. 480 (Okla. 1912)
127 P. 480

Citing Cases

White v. Putnam

tract of listing, made and entered into by and between the parties to this action, in which the value of the…

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Long

A case will not be reversed for want of evidence, if there is any evidence, including every valid inference…