From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. Crane

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 9, 1990
559 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1966.

March 8, 1990. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Lon S. Cornellus, Jr., J.

Howard S. Reiss, Orlando, for appellant.

Richard Trapp, Orlando, for appellee.


This is the appeal of an order denying appellee's motion for entry of an order of contempt for failure of the appellant/husband to satisfy an award of attorney's fees to the appellee/wife in a custody modification proceeding. The order appealed recites that the husband would be subject to sanctions in the nature of contempt if the attorney's fees awarded by the court were not paid by a certain date. Because we find the challenged order is a non-final, non-appealable order, the court does not have jurisdiction to decide this matter. See Culpepper v. Culpepper, 103 Fla. 390, 138 So. 799 (Fla. 1931). See also Madden v. Madden, 558 P.2d 669 (Wyo. 1977). We decline to treat this appeal as a petition for writ of common law certiorari because we conclude the trial court's ruling did not depart from essential requirements of law.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crane v. Crane

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 9, 1990
559 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Crane v. Crane

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ALEXANDER CRANE, APPELLANT, v. EILEEN CRANE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 9, 1990

Citations

559 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Sell v. Sell

[1] We conclude that the order is not appealable and this court is without jurisdiction to review it because…

Eggleston v. Eggleston

Hollander v. Vetrick, 675 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Didier v. Didier, 669 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 1st DCA…