From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane Co. v. Mathes

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 12, 1930
42 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1930)

Opinion

No. 5695.

July 12, 1930.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Louisiana; Benjamin C. Dawkins, Judge.

Action by Willie Mathes against the Crane Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

St. Clair Adams, of New Orleans, La. and Joseph B. Crow, of Shreveport, La., for appellant.

Yandell Boatner and Byron A. Irwin, both of Shreveport, La. (Pugh, Grimmet Boatner, of Shreveport, La., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BRYAN and FOSTER, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.


Appellee was injured in a collision between an automobile truck belonging to his employer upon which he was riding and another automobile truck, owned and operated by appellant. He recovered a verdict on which judgment was entered.

Error is assigned to the overruling of a motion for a directed verdict and to the refusal to give a number of special charges requested.

There was evidence tending to show that the truck upon which appellee was riding was covered with a wide platform, and that at the time of his injury he was seated on the platform at the front end of the truck with his legs dangling. It is argued that he should have been seated in the cab of the truck or have been on the truck back of the cab; that, if he had been so located, he would not have been injured; that this constituted contributory negligence and was the proximate cause of the injury. This argument is without merit. Appellee had the right to be on his employer's truck, and his position was safe enough if the collision had not occurred. The questions of negligence and contributory negligence were properly left to the jury.

The special requests were predicated on the alleged contributory negligence of appellee. No exception was noted to the general charge of the court. The charge covered the special requests so far as they were applicable.

The record presents no reversible error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Crane Co. v. Mathes

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 12, 1930
42 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1930)
Case details for

Crane Co. v. Mathes

Case Details

Full title:CRANE CO. v. MATHES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jul 12, 1930

Citations

42 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1930)

Citing Cases

Webb v. Batten

Riding on the running board of a moving automobile is not necessarily negligence. It was a question for the…

Rollison v. Hicks

When the plaintiff's testimony is laid alongside this test, it is manifest that the question whether…