From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crandall v. City of Amsterdam

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 21, 1939
19 N.E.2d 926 (N.Y. 1939)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1939

Decided February 21, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Harry V. Borst, Corporation Counsel ( Timothy F. Cohan of counsel), for appellant.

Charles E. Hardies and Floyd J. Reinhart for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Cosgrove v. City of Newburgh, 273 N.Y. 542.) No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Crandall v. City of Amsterdam

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 21, 1939
19 N.E.2d 926 (N.Y. 1939)
Case details for

Crandall v. City of Amsterdam

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH CRANDALL, Respondent, v. CITY OF AMSTERDAM, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 21, 1939

Citations

19 N.E.2d 926 (N.Y. 1939)
19 N.E.2d 926

Citing Cases

Youngblood v. Cazenovia

" An example of active negligence regarding sidewalks is Crandall v City of Amsterdam ( 254 App. Div. 39,…

Richardson v. City of Lockport

The rule is a harsh one and undoubtedly, in many instances, it has and will result in hardship to many who…