From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cranbury Tp. v. Middlesex Cty. Bd. of Taxation

Tax Court of New Jersey
Jul 31, 1985
7 N.J. Tax 667 (Tax 1985)

Opinion

Submitted April 17, 1985.

Decided July 31, 1985.

Before Judges FRITZ, GAULKIN and LONG.

On appeal from Tax Court of New Jersey.

Huff, Moran Balint, attorneys for appellant ( William C. Moran, Jr., of counsel and on the brief).

Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent ( James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Harry Haushalter, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).


We affirm, substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Andrew in his opinion in the Tax Court, 6 N.J. Tax 501 (Tax Ct. 1984).


Summaries of

Cranbury Tp. v. Middlesex Cty. Bd. of Taxation

Tax Court of New Jersey
Jul 31, 1985
7 N.J. Tax 667 (Tax 1985)
Case details for

Cranbury Tp. v. Middlesex Cty. Bd. of Taxation

Case Details

Full title:TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY…

Court:Tax Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 31, 1985

Citations

7 N.J. Tax 667 (Tax 1985)

Citing Cases

Englewood Cliffs v. Dir., Div. of Tax

Therefore, there is a rational basis for the Director's long-standing policy of excluding a sale from the…

Calton Homes v. West Windsor TP

Thus, sales of qualified farmland cannot be used in the sales ratio studies that provide the basis for the…