From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cramer v. Woodford

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 18, 2006
No. C 04-4707 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2006)

Opinion

No. C 04-4707 MMC (PR).

January 18, 2006


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 7, 2005, the Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted leave to file, within 30 days, an amended complaint curing the deficiencies noted. The Court cautioned plaintiff that his failure to file an amended complaint within the time provided would result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (holding further action by district court necessary where plaintiff fails to amend after dismissal with leave to amend).

The Clerk shall close the file and terminate any pending motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cramer v. Woodford

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 18, 2006
No. C 04-4707 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Cramer v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CRAMER, Plaintiff, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 18, 2006

Citations

No. C 04-4707 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2006)