From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craddock v. Craddock

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Feb 15, 1932
8 P.2d 1112 (Colo. 1932)

Opinion

No. 12,720.

Decided February 15, 1932. Rehearing denied March 7, 1932.

Action for divorce. Decree for plaintiff.

Affirmed.

1. APPELLATE PROCEDURE — Divided Court. One justice not participating and the others being evenly divided as to what disposition should be made of the case, the judgment is affirmed by operation of law.

Error to the District Court of El Paso County, Hon. Arthur Cornforth, Judge.

Messrs. PHELPS, BAKER GOBIN, Mr. E. D. CAROTHERS, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. SAMUEL H. KINSLEY, Mr. LEON H. SNYDER, for defendant in error.


MR. Justice Alter has not participated in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Burke and Campbell are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Butler, Moore and Hilliard are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Craddock v. Craddock

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
Feb 15, 1932
8 P.2d 1112 (Colo. 1932)
Case details for

Craddock v. Craddock

Case Details

Full title:CRADDOCK v. CRADDOCK

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc

Date published: Feb 15, 1932

Citations

8 P.2d 1112 (Colo. 1932)
8 P.2d 1112

Citing Cases

In re Death of Ferguson

See, e.g., State Department of Highways v. Biella, 672 P.2d 529 (Colo. 1983); City County of Denver v. Board…

Craddock v. Palmer

A Writ of error was sued out of this court to review that judgment (No. 12,720). On consideration of the…