From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cracco v. Barras

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 18, 1988
520 So. 2d 371 (La. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-C-0116.

February 25, 1988. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1988.

In re: Barras, Philip J.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans Civil District Court Div. "B" Number 83-6655.


Writ Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and the judgment of the district court is reinstated for the following reasons:

The reasons for judgment of the district judge were correct. It was not clearly wrong for the trial judge to have discounted the self-serving testimony of the plaintiff-physician, nor were the sums of money awarded to the defendant as setoff against the plaintiff's demand excessive. Furthermore, attorney's fees may be collected under R.S. 9:2781 only if written demand is made "correctly setting forth the amount owed."In this case the amount demanded, found to be subject to a set-off, was therefore not correct. Attorney's fee statutes must be construed strictly because the award of attorney fees is exceptional and penal in nature. Frank L. Beier Radio, Inc. v. Black Gold Marine, Inc., 449 So.2d 1014 (La. 1984).


Summaries of

Cracco v. Barras

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 18, 1988
520 So. 2d 371 (La. 1988)
Case details for

Cracco v. Barras

Case Details

Full title:ALAIN F. CRACCO, M.D. v. PHILLIP J. BARRAS

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 18, 1988

Citations

520 So. 2d 371 (La. 1988)

Citing Cases

Guedon & Associates, Inc. v. Haik

The amount demanded must be the correct amount. Cracco v. Barras, 520 So.2d 371, 372 (La. 1988); Fleet Tire…

Trahan v. Savage Industries

Attorney fees statutes must be construed strictly because the award of attorney fees is exceptional and penal…