From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crabtree v. Houghton

Supreme Court of California
Apr 20, 1923
191 Cal. 33 (Cal. 1923)

Opinion

L. A. No. 7447.

April 20, 1923.

APPEAL from all order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing to strike out an item from cost bill. Charles S. Crail, Judge. Reversed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Charles J. Kelly for Appellant.

J. Vernon Givan for Respondent.


This is an appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to strike from the cost bill of the plaintiff an item of $26.75 paid by the plaintiff for making a map introduced as Plaintiff's Exhibit 7 upon the trial of the action.

It was stipulated by the parties that the map referred to in the item was prepared for use as an exhibit and was in fact so used, and that the sum paid therefor was fair and reasonable and that the map was not prepared at the request of or under the directions of the trial court nor by stipulation of either of the parties, but was made at the sole instance of the plaintiff in said action. [1] The court should have granted the defendant's motion to strike out this item upon the authority of Bathgate v. Irvine, 126 Cal. 135 [77 Am. St. Rep. 158, 58 P. 442].

The court is directed to modify the judgment by striking out the item of $26.75 costs, appellant to have his costs on appeal.

Lennon, J., Lawlor, J., Seawell, J., Myers, J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Crabtree v. Houghton

Supreme Court of California
Apr 20, 1923
191 Cal. 33 (Cal. 1923)
Case details for

Crabtree v. Houghton

Case Details

Full title:R. R. CRABTREE, Respondent, v. W. H. HOUGHTON, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 20, 1923

Citations

191 Cal. 33 (Cal. 1923)
214 P. 846

Citing Cases

Simms v. County of Los Angeles

5) The photographs, however, were apparently obtained at the sole instance of plaintiffs for the purpose of…

Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.

The trial court struck from the cost bill "expert witness fees" of the two doctors but, by order, allowed one…