From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Mason

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 15, 1971
247 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Summary

finding sufficient evidence of causation where evidence showed some devices contained defect which caused fracture, plaintiff's device fractured, and all other possible causes excluded

Summary of this case from Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

Opinion

No. 70-196.

March 3, 1971. Rehearing Denied April 15, 1971.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, C.M. Kissinger, J.

Cecyl L. Pickle, of Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler Pickle, Miami, for appellant.

Emerson L. Parker, of Parker Schultz, St. Petersburg, for Marlene Mason.

Glenn M. Woodworth, of Roney, Ulmer, Woodworth Jacobs, St. Petersburg, for Trustees of Mease Hospital.


An intravenous catheter inserted into the vein of plaintiff was severed somehow and part of it traveled through the vein to the heart, necessitating complex surgery. Bard manufactured the catheter and contends that the verdict against it is founded on an inference on an inference.

There was testimony that a small percentage of Bard's catheters contained burrs which could result in the severance of the inserted portion even though it was properly inserted. The jury's verdict depends on finding that this happened in this instance. Bard says that this finding depends upon inference that the particular catheter — both ends of which were "routinely" discarded by the two hospitals involved — was faulty and a further inference that the portion which traveled to the heart was severed in this manner. This is a beguiling argument, but it is not an "inference upon an inference" as that misunderstood phrase is used in the cases. Of course a finding that the catheter was severed as a consequence of faulty manufacture is based on an inference. There is no direct proof of this fact. But all of the other possibilities are excluded by direct evidence which the jury could — and obviously did — believe. This leaves the inference of faulty manufacture sufficiently supported. See Tillery v. Standard Sand and Silica Co., Fla.App. 1969, 226 So.2d 842; Annotation, 5 A.L.R. 3d 100.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C.J., and McNULTY, J., concur.


Summaries of

C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Mason

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 15, 1971
247 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

finding sufficient evidence of causation where evidence showed some devices contained defect which caused fracture, plaintiff's device fractured, and all other possible causes excluded

Summary of this case from Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

finding sufficient evidence of causation where evidence showed some devices contained defect which caused fracture, plaintiff's device fractured, and all other possible causes excluded

Summary of this case from Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

In Bard, an intravenous catheter inserted into the vein of the plaintiff severed and part of it traveled through the vein to the heart causing injuries requiring surgery.

Summary of this case from Worsham v. A.H. Robins Co.
Case details for

C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Mason

Case Details

Full title:C.R. BARD, INC., APPELLANT, v. MARLENE MASON, A SINGLE WOMAN, FORMERLY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 15, 1971

Citations

247 So. 2d 471 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

Worsham v. A.H. Robins Co.

To prove that the product she used was defective, the plaintiff did not have to produce it at trial. C.R.…

Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.

A factfinder could conclude from the foregoing evidence that the complications Tillman claims to have…