From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 10, 1986
493 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Summary

In Coyle v. State, 493 So.2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), this court reversed a trial court's denial of a judgment of acquittal, when this court found that there was insufficient evidence to connect a stolen car to the appellant, who had been convicted of its theft.

Summary of this case from In re Interest of A.P.

Opinion

No. 85-2444.

September 10, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, William C. Owen, Jr., J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Robert M. Coyle appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence and contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We reverse.

Appellant was convicted of theft of Harold Houser's vehicle pursuant to section 812.014(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1983). Appellant moved for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the prosecutor failed to prove that the vehicle found in appellant's possession was the car that was taken from Houser. The judgment of acquittal should have been granted because the record reveals that there was insufficient evidence that the vehicle in Coyle's possession was the same as the vehicle taken from Houser. There is a missing link because there is no evidence to connect the car the police returned to Houser and the car found in Coyle's possession. See Morgan v. State, 186 So.2d 795 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).

The Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution compels us to remand this case with instructions to the trial court to discharge the appellant because the State failed to present sufficient evidence at trial that the vehicle in Coyle's possession was the vehicle taken from Houser. See Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 98 S.Ct. 2141, 57 L.Ed.2d 15 (1978); Greene v. Massey, 437 U.S. 19, 98 S.Ct. 2151, 57 L.Ed.2d 15 (1978); Kimbler v. State, 360 So.2d 1270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coyle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 10, 1986
493 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

In Coyle v. State, 493 So.2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), this court reversed a trial court's denial of a judgment of acquittal, when this court found that there was insufficient evidence to connect a stolen car to the appellant, who had been convicted of its theft.

Summary of this case from In re Interest of A.P.
Case details for

Coyle v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT M. COYLE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 10, 1986

Citations

493 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

S.P.L. v. State

The absence of evidence to connect identified property with property found in the defendant's possession has…

Santiago v. State

The court held that the correct ruling would be to discharge the defendant. The court, referring to its…