From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 27, 2011
373 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57287.

12-27-2011

Brian Edward COX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Christopher R. Arabia Nye County District Attorney Attorney General/Carson City


Christopher R. Arabia

Nye County District Attorney

Attorney General/Carson City

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a jury verdict of possession of a firearm by an ex-felon. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Department 1.

Appellant Brian Edward Cox contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion in limine to prohibit any reference to the severed charges, overruling his corpus delicti objections, and denying his motion to dismiss the case because the State failed to establish the corpus delicti independently of his extrajudicial admissions. Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the parties' arguments, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See NRS 48.035(3) ; Bellon v. State, 121 Nev. 436, 444, 117 P.3d 176, 181 (2005) (discussing admissibility of evidence under the “complete story of the crime” doctrine); Doyle v. State, 112 Nev. 879, 892, 921 P.2d 901, 910 (1996) (describing the independent proof necessary to satisfy the corpus delicti rule), overruled on other grounds by Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 333, 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004) ; Hill v. State, 124 Nev. 546, 550, 188 P.3d 51, 54 (2008). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Cox v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 27, 2011
373 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Cox v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brian Edward COX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Dec 27, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 906 (Nev. 2011)