From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Cox

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jun 3, 2015
SCWC-12-0000762 (Haw. Jun. 3, 2015)

Opinion

SCWC-12-0000762

06-03-2015

BRUCE EDWARD COX, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARLYN DAVIDSON COX, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

R. Steven Geshell for petitioner Carlyn Davidson Cox, respondent pro se


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-12-0000762; FC-D NO. 06-1-0096)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
()

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Bruce Edward Cox's application for writ of certiorari filed on April 28, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 3, 2015. R. Steven Geshell for petitioner Carlyn Davidson Cox, respondent pro se

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

Cox v. Cox

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Jun 3, 2015
SCWC-12-0000762 (Haw. Jun. 3, 2015)
Case details for

Cox v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE EDWARD COX, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARLYN DAVIDSON COX…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Jun 3, 2015

Citations

SCWC-12-0000762 (Haw. Jun. 3, 2015)

Citing Cases

Cox v. Cox

” The ICA, relying upon Nelson v. University of Hawai‘i, 99 Hawai‘i 262, 265, 54 P.3d 433, 436 (2002), and…