From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COWARD v. DE CRAY

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Sep 27, 1918
38 Cal.App. 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2606.

September 27, 1918.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. Benj. K. Knight, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

R. H. Smith and Emmet C. Rittenhouse, for Appellants.

Wyckoff Gardner and Chas. B. Younger, for Respondents.


In this case it has been stipulated by the parties, and in accordance therewith, ordered by the court, that the appeal should be submitted to the court for decision upon the briefs and transcript filed and arguments made in an appeal involving the same parties and the same questions, numbered 2530 and entitled, Mary V. Coward, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Agnes De Cray, as Executrix, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants; Catherine L. Cody et al., Defendants and Respondents.

A decision in the above-entitled appeal, No. 2530, has this day been rendered and filed ( ante, p. 290, [ 176 P. 56]), and for the reasons given therein, and in accordance with the stipulation and order filed herein, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., pro tem., and Beasly, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

COWARD v. DE CRAY

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Sep 27, 1918
38 Cal.App. 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
Case details for

COWARD v. DE CRAY

Case Details

Full title:MARY V. COWARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. AGNES DE CRAY, as Executrix…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: Sep 27, 1918

Citations

38 Cal.App. 783 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918)
176 P. 57

Citing Cases

Davis v. Rossi

s. v. Colgin, 5 Mumf. 42; Cameron v. Cameron, 10 Smedes Marshall, 394; Jones v. Somerville, 28 So. 940;…