From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Covington & Cincinnati Elevated Railroad v. Kentucky

U.S.
May 26, 1894
154 U.S. 224 (1894)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.

No. 1043.

Argued April 25, 1894. Decided May 26, 1894.

The judgment in this case is reversed on the authority of Covington Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Kentucky, ante, 204.

Mr. William H. Jackson, (with whom was Mr. W.H. Wadsworth on the brief,) for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William J. Hendrick, Attorney General of the State of Kentucky, and Mr. William Goebel for defendant in error.


THE case is stated in the opinion.


This case differs from the last only in the fact that the plaintiff in error was not incorporated until 1886, and subsequently to a general law of the State declaring that all charters and grants of or to corporations shall be subject to amendment or repeal at the will of the legislature. Conceding that these words became a part of its charter, and hence that no contract was impaired by the legislation of 1890, such legislation is still open to the objection found to exist in the former case, that it is in conflict with the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky is, therefore,

Reversed, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, MR. JUSTICE FIELD, MR. JUSTICE GRAY, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE concurred in the judgment of reversal, for the like reasons as in the case of Covington Bridge v. Kentucky, ante, 204, 223.


Summaries of

Covington & Cincinnati Elevated Railroad v. Kentucky

U.S.
May 26, 1894
154 U.S. 224 (1894)
Case details for

Covington & Cincinnati Elevated Railroad v. Kentucky

Case Details

Full title:COVINGTON AND CINCINNATI ELEVATED RAILROAD AND TRANSFER AND BRIDGE COMPANY…

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 26, 1894

Citations

154 U.S. 224 (1894)

Citing Cases

Port Richmond Ferry v. Hudson County

A State cannot prescribe rates to be charged by a person or corporation operating an interstate ferry not in…