referring to rescinded "relaxed waiver" rule utilized in DeJesus that allowed reviewing court to address merits of waived claims in capital direct appeals
Summary of this case from In re Interest of N.M.No. 07–9266.
2008-05-12
Bernard COUSAR, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.
Case below, 593 Pa. 204, 928 A.2d 1025.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, denied.
referring to rescinded "relaxed waiver" rule utilized in DeJesus that allowed reviewing court to address merits of waived claims in capital direct appeals
Summary of this case from In re Interest of N.M.explaining where appellant makes specific objection at trial he cannot assert new grounds for relief on appeal
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. LafantanoFull title:Bernard COUSAR, petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: May 12, 2008
Thus, a prior Miranda violation does not necessarily disable a suspect from waiving Miranda rights in the…
Commonwealth v. McGriffIt is well-established that "[a] party complaining, on appeal, of the admission of evidence in the court…