From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Courts v. Smart

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
May 26, 1939
33 Cal.App.2d 89 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

Opinion

Docket No. 10792.

May 26, 1939.

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County. A.R. Cotton, Judge. Reversed in part and dismissed in part.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Ross D. Pelton and J. Hampton Hoge for Appellant.

Francis N. Foley for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] All of the parties to the above-entitled action have joined in a stipulation requesting a reversal of that portion of the judgment appealed from herein, awarding damages against the appellant Chas. A. Smart, and the reentry of judgment in his favor on the cause of action sued upon in the complaint; and it appears from an examination of the record on appeal, including the transcript of the evidence, that legal grounds exist for the granting of such request. It is ordered, therefore, that said portion of the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby reversed with directions to reenter the same in appellant's favor on the cause of action set forth in the complaint; and it is further ordered that in accordance with the terms of such stipulation the companion appeal taken by the said Chas. A. Smart from that portion of said judgment denying him relief on the cause of action sued upon in his cross-complaint be dismissed, and that the remittitur herein issue forthwith, without costs to either of the parties to said appeal.


Summaries of

Courts v. Smart

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
May 26, 1939
33 Cal.App.2d 89 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
Case details for

Courts v. Smart

Case Details

Full title:FRANK COURTS, Jr., a Minor, etc., Respondent, v. ARTHUR D. THOMSON et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: May 26, 1939

Citations

33 Cal.App.2d 89 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
91 P.2d 135

Citing Cases

In re Marriage of Shapiro

(2) An appellate court may properly reverse on stipulation after the court has decided, or had the…

People v. Kobrin

People v. Hedgecock, supra, 51 Cal.3d at p. 407 [Attorney General acknowledged materiality is element of Gov.…