From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

County of Tuolumne v. Oakdale Irrigation District

Supreme Court of California
Aug 30, 1948
32 Cal.2d 891 (Cal. 1948)

Opinion

Docket No. Sac. 5916.

August 30, 1948.

PROCEEDING in mandamus to compel an irrigation district and its directors to discontinue proceedings to include real property within its boundaries. Writ denied.

Robert Owen Curran, District Attorney (Mariposa), Virgil M. Airola, District Attorney (Calaveras), T.R. Vilas, District Attorney (Tuolumne), John L. Nourse and Ross A. Carkeet for Petitioner.

C. Ray Robinson, W. Eugene Craven, Margaret A. Flynn, P.J. Minasian, Rutherford, Jacobs, Cavalero Dietrich and Le Roy McCormick for Respondent.

W. Coburn Cook and Charles L. Childers, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.


This case involves the same questions presented in County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation District, ante, p. 467 [ 196 P.2d 920], and is controlled thereby. Therefore the petition for a peremptory writ of mandate is denied, and the alternative writ is discharged.

Gibson, C.J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Petitioner's application for a rehearing was denied September 27, 1948.


Summaries of

County of Tuolumne v. Oakdale Irrigation District

Supreme Court of California
Aug 30, 1948
32 Cal.2d 891 (Cal. 1948)
Case details for

County of Tuolumne v. Oakdale Irrigation District

Case Details

Full title:COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, Petitioner, v. OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 30, 1948

Citations

32 Cal.2d 891 (Cal. 1948)
196 P.2d 927

Citing Cases

Oakdale Irr. Dist. v. County of Calaveras

On August 30, 1948 the Supreme Court discharged the writ ( County of Calaveras v. Oakdale Irr. Dist., 32…