From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

County of Rockland v. Kaeyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2003
309 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06491

Argued September 11, 2003.

October 27, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for professional malpractice and breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated June 13, 2002, which granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5).

Patricia Zugibe, County Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Thomas Simeti of counsel), for appellant.

L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita Contini, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Annalee Cataldo-Barile of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5). A professional malpractice cause of action asserted against an architect accrues upon completion of performance, when the architect's professional relationship with the owner ends ( see Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade Douglas v. Energypro Constr. Partners, 271 A.D.2d 233, 234; Methodist Hosp. v. Perkins Will Partnership, 203 A.D.2d 435). Here, the professional relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant Kaeyer, Garment Davidson Architects, P.C. (hereinafter KGD) ended when KGD submitted its final addendum on September 27, 1995. The plaintiff's action against KGD was commenced more than three years after that date, and thus, the professional malpractice cause of action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations ( see CPLR 214).

The plaintiff's breach of contract cause of action against the defendant Falk Associates, Inc. (hereinafter Falk), the consultant hired by KGD, is also barred by the statute of limitations. A breach of contract cause of action accrues, and the six-year statute of limitations starts to run, upon the occurrence of the breach ( see CPLR 213; Ely-Cruikshank Co. v. Bank of Montreal, 81 N.Y.2d 399, 402; Mauro v. Niemann Agency, 303 A.D.2d 468; Levy v. T.P. Luss Co., 267 A.D.2d 213; Bernstein v. La Rue, 120 A.D.2d 476, 477). Falk completed its work pursuant to its contract as a consultant for KGD on July 13, 1995. The plaintiff's action was commenced more than six years after that date, and thus, the breach of contract cause of action was time-barred.

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

County of Rockland v. Kaeyer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 27, 2003
309 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

County of Rockland v. Kaeyer

Case Details

Full title:COUNTY OF ROCKLAND, appellant, v. KAEYER, GARMENT DAVIDSON ARCHITECTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 27, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 359

Citing Cases

Paul J. Napoli v. Moisan Architects

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, his cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract "is…

ACTIVE RET. CMTY. v. TRITEC/KLEWIN CONSTRUCTORS, LLC

The legislative history makes clear that "where the underlying complaint is one which essentially claims that…