From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coulter v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 11, 1969
411 F.2d 1189 (5th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 27086.

June 11, 1969. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1969.

Donald M. Hunt, W. Gordon Dickinson, Cecil Kuhne, Lubbock, Tex., for Coulters.

Key, Carr, Carr Clark, Lubbock, Tex., for Sears, Roebuck Co.

Kenneth Bowlin, Alton R. Griffin, Cade, Bowlin Griffin, Lubbock, Tex., for Warwick Electronics, Inc.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, DYER, Circuit Judge, and HUNTER, District Judge.


This is an appeal from an order dismissing a third party complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the person of the third party defendant, Warwick Electronics, Inc., under the Texas "long-arm" statute, Vernon's Ann.Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. art. 2031b (1964). The appealability of the order depends upon an express discretionary determination by the District Court that there is no just reason for delay and an express direction for entry of judgment according to the provisions of Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No such action having been taken by the District Court, the appeal will be dismissed. Peralta v. Quad Tool Dye Supply Co., 3 Cir. 1966, 370 F.2d 103; David v. District of Columbia, 1950, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 92, 187 F.2d 204. See New Orleans Public Belt Ry. v. Wallace, 5 Cir. 1949, 173 F.2d 145.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Coulter v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 11, 1969
411 F.2d 1189 (5th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Coulter v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Case Details

Full title:Glenn Earl COULTER and wife Eldera Coulter, Plaintiffs, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 11, 1969

Citations

411 F.2d 1189 (5th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

United States v. Crow, Pope Land Enterprises

Accordingly, although the parties and the court agreed that the hearing on the navigability question would be…

State, ex Rel. Jacobs, v. Municipal Court

Appellant correctly concedes that an order dismissing a third-party complaint is not a final appealable…