From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 19, 2001
274 F.3d 1306 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

No. 99-15645.

December 19, 2001.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Rawlinson was recused.


Summaries of

Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 19, 2001
274 F.3d 1306 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Catharina F. COSTA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DESERT PALACE, INC., dba…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 19, 2001

Citations

274 F.3d 1306 (9th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc.

Kolstad v. Am. Dental Ass'n, 527 U.S. 526, 119 S.Ct. 2118, 144 L.Ed.2d 494 (1999). Costa v. Desert Palace,…

Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc.

In this classic instance of what has been termed a "mixed-motive" case, the employer, Caesars Palace Hotel…