From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Trapier

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1964
15 N.Y.2d 503 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued September 29, 1964

Decided October 15, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ABRAHAM N. GELLER, J.

Abraham Shapiro, Emanuel Morgenbesser and Lester Samuels for appellant.

Noel W. Hauser for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. A judgment for plaintiffs in the negligence action, sought here to be stayed, will not preclude plaintiff insurer in this action from attempting to prove that the liability, if any, of James Trapier is not within the policy coverage because the occurrence was in reality an intentional assault ( Exchange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Blazey, 19 A.D.2d 682, mot. for lv. to app. den. 13 N.Y.2d 601; see Prashker v. United States Guar. Co., 1 N.Y.2d 584).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Trapier

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1964
15 N.Y.2d 503 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Trapier

Case Details

Full title:COSMOPOLITAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. JAMES TRAPIER et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 15, 1964

Citations

15 N.Y.2d 503 (N.Y. 1964)
254 N.Y.S.2d 111
202 N.E.2d 558

Citing Cases

Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Alma

Since the Almas cannot recover from Lizza unless the depression arose from Lizza's operations, the issue…

Kaczmarek v. Shoffstall

State Farm is not prejudiced by the court's denial of intervenor status. Since it will not be bound by a…