Summary
In Corso v. Knapp, 347 Ill. App. 556, it was held that where a party attempts an explanation of why a witness was absent the other party has a right to comment on what he considers the inadequacy of the explanation.
Summary of this case from Santiemmo v. Days Transfer, Inc.Opinion
Gen. No. 45,603. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed July 1, 1952 Released for publication August 5, 1952
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. FRANK A. BICEK, Judge, presiding. Judgment affirmed. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the October term, 1951.
Wyatt Jacobs, for appellants;
Charles E. Heckler, of counsel;
William H. Arpaia, for appellee;
William H. Arpaia, and Norman S. Rothbart, of counsel.
Not to be published in full. Opinion filed July 1, 1952; released for publication August 5, 1952.