From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corsino v. Com., D.O.T

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
May 14, 2002
798 A.2d 1292 (Pa. 2002)

Summary

In Com. v. Corsino, 261 Pa. 593 at page 598, 104 A. 739, 740, we held: `It is the inherent right of the prisoner in a capital case to be present at every stage of the proceedings from the arraignment to the rendition of the verdict.

Summary of this case from Kuhl v. District Court of the First Judicial District

Opinion

No. 927 MAL 2001.

May 14, 2002.

No. 927 MAL 2001, Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.


Summaries of

Corsino v. Com., D.O.T

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
May 14, 2002
798 A.2d 1292 (Pa. 2002)

In Com. v. Corsino, 261 Pa. 593 at page 598, 104 A. 739, 740, we held: `It is the inherent right of the prisoner in a capital case to be present at every stage of the proceedings from the arraignment to the rendition of the verdict.

Summary of this case from Kuhl v. District Court of the First Judicial District

In Com. v. Corsino, 261 Pa. 593, at 598, we held: "It is the inherent right of the prisoner in a capital case to be present at every stage of the proceedings from the arraignment to the rendition of the verdict.

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Johnson

In Com. v. Corsino, 261 Pa. 593 at page 598 [104 A. 739, 740], we held: `It is the inherent right of the prisoner in a capital case to be present at every stage of the proceedings from the arraignment to the rendition of the verdict.

Summary of this case from People v. Neal
Case details for

Corsino v. Com., D.O.T

Case Details

Full title:EPHRAIM CORSINO, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District

Date published: May 14, 2002

Citations

798 A.2d 1292 (Pa. 2002)
568 Pa. 741

Citing Cases

Peoples v. Burns

The trial judge in his discretion may prevent an undue lengthening of a trial by repetition. Where a question…

People v. Neal

The comment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth v. Johnson, 348 Pa. 349 [ 35 A.2d 312], is…