From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corrington v. Webb

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 5, 1967
375 F.2d 298 (9th Cir. 1967)

Summary

reviewing for abuse of discretion

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Axton

Opinion

No. 21047.

April 5, 1967.

Lionel Richman, Lewis Garrett, Herbert M. Ansell, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief Civil Div., Larry L. Dier, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and HALBERT, District Judge.


Appellant instituted this action in the district court seeking reinstatement to the Civil Service position from which he was removed, and back pay. The district court granted the government's motion for summary judgment on the ground of laches, there being a thirty-four month delay between final removal of appellant from his position at the administrative level and the filing of the law suit to review that removal.

We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district judge in the granting of the government's motion for summary judgment on the ground of laches.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Corrington v. Webb

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 5, 1967
375 F.2d 298 (9th Cir. 1967)

reviewing for abuse of discretion

Summary of this case from Jackson v. Axton
Case details for

Corrington v. Webb

Case Details

Full title:James W. CORRINGTON, Appellant, v. James E. WEBB, etc., et al., Appellees

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 5, 1967

Citations

375 F.2d 298 (9th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.

In Jackson v. Axton, 25 F.3d 884, 888 (9th Cir. 1994), we remarked, "This court has reviewed a grant of…

Jarrow Formulas Inc v. Nutrition Now

In Jackson v. Axton, 25 F.3d 884, 888 (9th Cir. 1994), we remarked, "This court has reviewed a grant of…