holding that federal common law choice of law rules are to be applied in federal question cases.
Summary of this case from In re Powerburst Corp.No. 80-688.
January 12, 1981, October TERM, 1980.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 629 F. 2d 786.
holding that federal common law choice of law rules are to be applied in federal question cases.
Summary of this case from In re Powerburst Corp.finding jurisdiction under Section 632, in an action alleging fraudulent inducement, on the basis of a letter of credit issued by a federally chartered bank no longer party to the suit
Summary of this case from In re Lloyd's American Trust Fund Litig.discussing feasibility in terms of economic and technological possibilities
Summary of this case from Tuer v. McDonaldFull title:CORPORACION VENEZOLANA DE FOMENTO v. MERBAN CORP. et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 12, 1981
In DeLuryea v. Winthrop Laboratories, 697 F.2d 222, 227-29 (8th Cir. 1983), a case involving a drug…
Werner v. CarboWe hold that the professional corporation was entitled to relief from judgment and accordingly reverse the…