From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cornic v. Stewart

Supreme Court of California.Department One
Nov 12, 1918
179 Cal. 242 (Cal. 1918)

Opinion

L. A. No. 4567.

November 12, 1918.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, sustaining a demurrer and refusing leave to amend. Grant Jackson, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Willedd Andrews, for Appellant.

James W. Barnes, for Respondent.


In this case no respondent's brief has been filed, but a cursory examination of the record discloses that the only appear before us is an attempted appeal from two orders of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff's first amended complaint and denying the plaintiff's application for leave to file a second amended complaint. Neither of these orders are appealable orders and there is no appeal from the judgment. It follows that the appeals must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Sloss, J., and Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

Cornic v. Stewart

Supreme Court of California.Department One
Nov 12, 1918
179 Cal. 242 (Cal. 1918)
Case details for

Cornic v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:J. W. CORNIC, Appellant, v. GERTIE E. STEWART, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of California.Department One

Date published: Nov 12, 1918

Citations

179 Cal. 242 (Cal. 1918)
176 P. 164

Citing Cases

Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. Davies

Plaintiff's purported appeal, also, from a subsequent nonappealable order denying its motion for permission…

Sturgeon v. City of Hawthorne

(Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.) We do not believe it requires the citation of many authorities, but the case of…