From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cornell v. Eaton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 16, 1955
286 App. Div. 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

November 16, 1955.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Fulton County.

Present — Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Zeller, JJ.


The action is in equity, involving a dispute over rights of way. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that defendant William Eaton forged certain language in a deed. We cannot agree that, under the voluminous pleadings herein, the forgery is the only issue. The matters upon which the examination was allowed are, or at least could become, material and necessary. In an equity action no harm can come from a broad examination of a party, and the trial will be materially shortened to the extent that the facts are developed beforehand. Under the circumstances presented in this case it was within the discretion of the court at Special Term to grant the order appealed from. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.


Summaries of

Cornell v. Eaton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 16, 1955
286 App. Div. 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Cornell v. Eaton

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. CORNELL et al., Appellants, v. WILLIAM EATON et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1955

Citations

286 App. Div. 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Legnetti v. Camp Am.

Even under former section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, the courts tended to follow this more liberal…

City of Binghamton v. Arlington Hotel, Inc.

07, p. 31-13). Even under former section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, the courts tended to follow this more…