From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corley v. Hubbard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2007
No. CIV S-07-2079 LEW KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2079 LEW KJM P.

October 19, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Stanislaus County Superior Court. Stanislaus County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;

2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Corley v. Hubbard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2007
No. CIV S-07-2079 LEW KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2007)
Case details for

Corley v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY LEE CORLEY, Petitioner, v. S. HUBBARD, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2079 LEW KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2007)

Citing Cases

Western Contracting Corp. v. Odle

Defenses of assumption of risk and contributory negligence were asserted. Although the case was reversed and…

Hawkins v. Leach

3 N.Y.S.2d 870. See also Corley v. Hubbard, 129 Neb. 38. [3, 4] If in those cases the master was not liable…