From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Corey v. Corey

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 2, 1956
292 P.2d 1073 (Nev. 1956)

Opinion

No. 3887

February 2, 1956.

Appeal from the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Frank McNamee, Judge, Department No. 1.

Emilie N. Wanderer, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

R. Dale Cook, of Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


This is an appeal from decree of divorce granted in favor of the plaintiff husband. The appeal is brought upon the ground that in two respects the findings are unsupported by the evidence.

We need not deal with the factual basis of this contention. The record on appeal contains no transcript of testimony taken at the time of trial nor was any statement of the evidence prepared pursuant to Rule 75(n) N.R.C.P. Appellant, then, has wholly failed to provide this court with the means for considering the merits of her contention.

Affirmed. No costs are allowed.


Summaries of

Corey v. Corey

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 2, 1956
292 P.2d 1073 (Nev. 1956)
Case details for

Corey v. Corey

Case Details

Full title:CONCETTA E. COREY, APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH F. COREY, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Feb 2, 1956

Citations

292 P.2d 1073 (Nev. 1956)
292 P.2d 1073

Citing Cases

Schatz v. Devitte

However, the record on appeal does not contain any transcript of testimony and we have no way of knowing in…