From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Woodford

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 9, 2004
357 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2004)

Opinion

No. 04-70578.

Filed February 9, 2004.

David T. Alexander, Esq., George Alan Yuhas, Esq., Lisa Marie Schull, Esq., Orrick, Herrington Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Holly D. Wilkens, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General (San Diego), San Diego, CA, for Respondent.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

A judge of this Court called for en banc review of the February 8, 2004 order in this case. A majority of the non-recused active judges have voted in favor of en banc review of the denial of Cooper's application to file a successor petition for writ of habeas corpus in the district court. The published order filed February 8, 2004 shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

The motion for stay of execution is granted pending further order of the en banc court.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Woodford

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 9, 2004
357 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2004)
Case details for

Cooper v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:Kevin COOPER, Petitioner, v. Jeanne WOODFORD, Warden, San Quentin State…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 9, 2004

Citations

357 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2004)

Citing Cases

Cooper v. Brown

Cooper's February 2, 2004 petition to the California Supreme Court raised similar claims to those asserted in…

U.S. v. Blagojevich

A court is authorized to rehear a case without a request by a party. Western Pacific R.R. Corp. v. Western,…