From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Chase & Co., Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Apr 1, 1942
2 F.R.D. 381 (S.D. Fla. 1942)

Opinion

         Action by Frank Cooper against Chase and Company, Incorporated. On defendant's motion to dismiss.

         Motion sustained.

          T. Warren Messick, of Roanoke, for plaintiff.

          T. P. Warlow and A. E. Carpenter, both of Orlando, Fla., for defendant.


          AKERMAN, District Judge.

         This cause coming on to be heard on the defendant's motion to dismiss, counsel for the defendant appeared in person, and counsel for the plaintiff submitted a brief.

         The Court is of the opinion that the motion to dismiss must be granted. The alleged libelous letter should either be set out in haec verba or its legal tenor pleaded in order that the Court may determine whether or not the same is libelous.

         Counsel for defendant will prepare and present to the Court an order sustaining the motion to dismiss and allowing the plaintiff until May 4th to file an amended complaint, if he so desires.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Chase & Co., Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida
Apr 1, 1942
2 F.R.D. 381 (S.D. Fla. 1942)
Case details for

Cooper v. Chase & Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:COOPER v. CHASE & CO., Inc.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Apr 1, 1942

Citations

2 F.R.D. 381 (S.D. Fla. 1942)

Citing Cases

Montgomery v. Kingsland

That the Commissioner of Patents received of his motion for a bill of particulars as tantamount to a motion…

Edelman v. Locker

Although the alleged slanderous statements are not set forth in specific words, the tenor of the statements…