From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Sims

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 2, 2023
1:21-cv-01478-AWI-EPG (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2023)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01478-AWI-EPG

03-02-2023

RON COOK, Plaintiff, v. RON SIMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS RON SIMS, JAMES FUNK, SALINA CORREA, AND FLOYD AVILA TO SUBMIT FILING REGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISAL

(ECF NO. 42)

On March 1, 2023, Plaintiff Ron Cook and Defendants Flor Garcia and Pacific Valley Patrol, Inc. filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice of the claims against these Defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). However, because Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) requires a stipulation of dismissal to be “signed by all parties who have appeared,” and only Plaintiff and Defendants Flor Garcia and Pacific Valley Patrol, Inc. have signed the stipulation, the Court will require the remaining Defendants in the case who have appeared-Ron Sims, James Funk, Salina Correa, and Floyd Avila-to submit a filing approving or opposing the stipulation of dismissal. See Thacker v. AT&T Corp., No. 2:20-CV-00255-KJM-CKD PS, 2021 WL 1784873, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 5, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, 2021 WL 4168533 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2021) (noting that court was “unaware of any case waiving the requirement that the stipulation . . . must be made by all parties who have appeared” and that “[t]he requirement to obtain all parties' consent to voluntarily dismiss (without a court order) is intended to ensure that a voluntary dismissal of a party at later stages of the litigation does not cause plain legal prejudice to the party to be dismissed or to the remaining defendant(s)”).

The stipulation also cites Rule 41(a)(2), which permits a court to dismiss an action at the Plaintiff s request “on terms that the court considers proper.” However, because the parties seek to “stipulate” to the dismissal of the claims against Defendants Flor Garcia and Pacific Valley Patrol, Inc., Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) governs.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. By no later than March 10, 2023, Defendants Ron Sims, James Funk, Salina Correa, and Floyd Avila shall file a signed document reflecting their approval of the stipulation of dismissal (ECF No. 42) or file a response opposing the stipulation of dismissal.

2. Alternatively, by no later than March 10, 2023, the parties may file a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in this action in compliance with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cook v. Sims

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Mar 2, 2023
1:21-cv-01478-AWI-EPG (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Cook v. Sims

Case Details

Full title:RON COOK, Plaintiff, v. RON SIMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Mar 2, 2023

Citations

1:21-cv-01478-AWI-EPG (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2023)