From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Northwestern Leather Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 6, 1966
146 N.W.2d 646 (Mich. 1966)

Opinion

Calendar No. 22, October Term, Docket No. 51,159.

Decided December 6, 1966.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board. (Calendar No. 22, October Term, Docket No. 51,159.) Decided December 6, 1966.

Clara D. Cook presented her claim for workmen's compensation benefits against Northwestern Leather Company, a Michigan corporation, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a foreign corporation. Benefits denied by Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board. Plaintiff filed an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, which remanded the matter of the Appeal Board for a finding of facts. Appeal Board determined plaintiff barred by limitational rule. Reversed and remanded.

Goodman, Crockett, Eden, Robb Philo ( Morton A. Eden, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Veum Veum ( Burney C. Veum, of counsel), for defendants.


The appeal board's determination that plaintiff's claim for compensation became barred by limitation is reversed and the record is remanded to the board for determination of the merits of plaintiff's said claim.

The Court notes that plaintiff's claim was denied by the appeal board solely on strength of the limitational rule found in Hajduk v. Revere Copper Brass, Inc., 268 Mich. 220 and decisions following Hajduk; which decisions were overruled retroactively by Autio v. Proksch Construction Company, 377 Mich. 517. On remand of this case the appeal board will disregard the aforesaid limitational rule.

The defendant-appellees proffer an additional question for review, in this form:

"Is there evidence in the record which will support a finding that plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the workmen's compensation act?"

This additional question is not open for review, same not having been included within the restrictive scope of the Court's order of January 27, 1965, remanding the record to the appeal board with instructions 1, 2 and 3 as set forth therein, and the corresponding scope of the Court's order of January 11, 1966, granting leave to review the appeal board's determination on such remand.

No costs.

T.M. KAVANAGH, C.J., and BLACK, SOURIS, SMITH, O'HARA, and ADAMS, JJ., concurred.

DETHMERS, J., concurred in result.

KELLY, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

Cook v. Northwestern Leather Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 6, 1966
146 N.W.2d 646 (Mich. 1966)
Case details for

Cook v. Northwestern Leather Co.

Case Details

Full title:COOK v. NORTHWESTERN LEATHER COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 6, 1966

Citations

146 N.W.2d 646 (Mich. 1966)
146 N.W.2d 646

Citing Cases

Norris v. Chrysler Corp.

Because the company's failure to file a report tolled the limitations, the Court remanded the case for…

Cibor v. Fabricon Products Co.

We dispose of defendants' contention by stating that under our previous decisions plaintiff was not barred by…