From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Converse Prof'l Grp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev. (In re City Center Constr. & Lien Master Litig.)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 3, 2013
No. 61027 (Nev. Oct. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61027

2013-10-03

IN RE: CITYCENTER CONSTRUCTION AND LIEN MASTER LITIGATION THE CONVERSE PROFESSIONAL GROUP D/B/A CONVERSE CONSULTANTS, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK AND THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH GOFF GONZALEZ, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and CENTURY STEEL, INC. AND PACIFIC COAST STEEL, Real Parties in Interest.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order granting real parties in interest's motions for leave to amend their fourth-party complaints in order to plead claims for intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, indemnity, contribution, apportionment, and declaratory relief.

In petitioner Converse Consultants' related petition, In re CityCenter Construction and Lien Master Litigation, 129 Nev. _, _, _ P.3d _,_ (Adv. Op. No. 70, Oct.3, 2013), we granted Converse's request for writ relief. We held that Converse was a design professional and, as a result, the initial pleadings that real parties in interest Century Steel, Inc. and Pacific Coast Steel filed were void ab initio pursuant to NRS 11.258. See Otak Nevada, LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. _, _, 260 P.3d 408, 412 (2011) (determining that "because a pleading filed under NRS 11.258 without the required affidavit and expert report is void ab initio and of no legal effect, the party's failure to comply with NRS 11.258 cannot be cured by amendment"); see also NRS 11.258.

We therefore conclude that this petition is moot, and we dismiss it. See Personhood Nevada v. Bristol, 126 Nev. _, _, 245 P.3d 572, 574 (2010) (explaining that this court's duty is to decide actual controversies and not to give opinions on moot questions). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

The Honorable Kristina Pickering, Chief Justice, and the Honorable Ron D. Parraguirre, Justice, voluntarily recused themselves from participation in the decision of this matter.

___________________, J.

Gibbons

___________________, J.

Hardesty

___________________, J.

Douglas

___________________, J.

Cherry

___________________, J.

Saitta
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas

Hutchison & Steffen, LLC

Albright Stoddard Warnick & Albright

Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP

Gordon & Rees, LLP

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Converse Prof'l Grp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev. (In re City Center Constr. & Lien Master Litig.)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 3, 2013
No. 61027 (Nev. Oct. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Converse Prof'l Grp. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev. (In re City Center Constr. & Lien Master Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: CITYCENTER CONSTRUCTION AND LIEN MASTER LITIGATION THE CONVERSE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 3, 2013

Citations

No. 61027 (Nev. Oct. 3, 2013)

Citing Cases

Gunderson v. The Irrevocable Tr. of Weidner

Nor were there viable amendments available based on the facts that remained before the district court—the…