From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE v. DE QUESADA

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 8, 1988
518 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

Nos. 87-1463, 87-1868.

December 15, 1987. Rehearing Denied February 8, 1988.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Richard S. Hickey, Judge.

Corlett, Killian, Hardeman, McIntosh Levi and Andrew E. Grigsby, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg, Carroll Halberg, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


We reverse the Final Declaratory Judgment based on a finding that the "Florida Amendment" to the insurance policy provided by Continental Insurance Company is valid and that Continental did not consent to arbitration. §§ 627.419(1), 682.02, Fla. Stat. (1985). See Lee v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 469 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA) (since the insurance policy in question is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect as written), review denied, 480 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 1985); Eugene W. Kelsey Son, Inc. v. Architectural Openings, Inc., 484 So.2d 610 (Fla. 5th DCA) (in order for a dispute to be arbitrable, a written contract must show the parties' intent to submit to arbitration), review denied, 492 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 1986).

Reversed.


Summaries of

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE v. DE QUESADA

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 8, 1988
518 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE v. DE QUESADA

Case Details

Full title:THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. DR. ARTURO DE QUESADA, ET…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 8, 1988

Citations

518 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)