From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Continental Insurance Companies v. Missouri

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Mar 30, 1987
815 F.2d 51 (8th Cir. 1987)

Summary

finding duty to defend

Summary of this case from U.S. Fidelity and Guar. v. Thomas Solvent

Opinion

No. 85-1940-WM.

March 30, 1987.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri; Russell G. Clark, Judge.


ORDER

The petitions for rehearing en banc have been considered by the Court and are hereby granted. The Clerk of this Court is directed to set this case for en banc argument on Tuesday, May 12, 1987 at 2:00 p.m. in St. Paul, Minnesota. The parties only are directed to file simultaneous 15-page supplemental briefs by April 20, 1987. Judges Richard Arnold and John Gibson did not participate in the rehearing vote.


Summaries of

Continental Insurance Companies v. Missouri

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Mar 30, 1987
815 F.2d 51 (8th Cir. 1987)

finding duty to defend

Summary of this case from U.S. Fidelity and Guar. v. Thomas Solvent
Case details for

Continental Insurance Companies v. Missouri

Case Details

Full title:THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, APPELLEE, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Mar 30, 1987

Citations

815 F.2d 51 (8th Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

U.S. Fidelity and Guar. v. Thomas Solvent

Plaintiff also argues that even conceding that there is a split in legal authority on this issue, in the…

TBG, Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.

TBG suggested an additional theory, termed the "injury-in-fact" theory of trigger, that has been applied in…