From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Continental Casualty Co., v. Synalloy Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Sep 8, 1987
826 F.2d 1024 (11th Cir. 1987)

Summary

interpreting similar contract language under Georgia law

Summary of this case from Owners Insurance Company v. James

Opinion

No. 86-8159.

September. 8, 1987.

James M. Thompson, Savannah, Ga., Joseph J. Blake, Jr., Haynsworth, Marion, McKay Guerard, Greenville, S.C., for Synalloy Corp.

James B. Hiers, Jr., Donald F. Daugherty, Atlanta, Ga., for General Acc.

David B. Higdon, Thomas F. Richardson, Macon, Ga., for Fidelity Cas.

Ronald D. Reemsnyder, Atlanta, Ga., for First State.

John W. Winborne III, Atlanta, Ga., for Midland Ins.

Thomas E. McCarter, David A. Handley, Michael W. Higgins, Atlanta, Ga., for Continental Cas. Co.

F. Taylor Putney, Jr., John D. Jones, Atlanta, Ga., for American Mut.

J. Robert Persons, Atlanta, Ga., for Affiliated FM Ins.

Richard R. Mehrhof, Jr., Augusta, Ga., for Stonewall Ins.

Daniel Reinhardt, Atlanta, Ga., James McGuire, New York City, for Lloyds of London.

Charles C. Stebbins III, Augusta, Ga., for Columbia Cas.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia; B. Avant Edenfield, Judge.

Before FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD, Senior District Judge.

Honorable Clarence W. Allgood, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.


Synalloy Corporation appeals from a final order in a declaratory judgment action entered in favor of Continental Casualty Company and dismissing all claims for damages against Synalloy's other insurers. After carefully reviewing the district court's analysis in this complex insurance case, we find that it is sound and in accordance with the law. We therefore affirm on the basis of the district court orders. See Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp., 667 F. Supp. 1550 (S.D.Ga. 1985) and Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp., 667 F. Supp. 1563 (S.D.Ga. 1986). Having affirmed the rulings of the district court, the cross appeal of Continental Casualty Company is moot and hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Continental Casualty Co., v. Synalloy Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Sep 8, 1987
826 F.2d 1024 (11th Cir. 1987)

interpreting similar contract language under Georgia law

Summary of this case from Owners Insurance Company v. James
Case details for

Continental Casualty Co., v. Synalloy Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT-APPELLEE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Sep 8, 1987

Citations

826 F.2d 1024 (11th Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. Cowan

5, 607 A.2d 1255 (1992); Gonzales v. Allstate Ins. Co., 122 N.M. 137, 921 P.2d 944, 947 (1996); State Farm…

South Carolina Ins. Co. v. Coody

Plaintiff contends that the language of this policy is unambiguous and requires defendants to establish that…