From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conte v. Brill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

May 13, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Composto, J.).


Order dated November 30, 1983 affirmed, insofar as appealed from.

Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.

The physician's affirmations submitted in support of the application for leave to amend the complaint were sufficient to establish a causal connection between the alleged acts of malpractice and the decedent's death ( cf. Fiorentino v. Cobble Hill Nursing Home, 101 A.D.2d 825). O'Connor, J.P., Weinstein, Brown and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Conte v. Brill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 13, 1985
111 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Conte v. Brill

Case Details

Full title:MARY CONTE, Respondent, v. BERNARD BRILL et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 13, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 210 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

San Marco v. Mount Kisco

( Cruz v New York City Tr. Auth., 136 AD2d 196; Roberts v Arrow Boat Club, 46 AD2d 815; Oboler v City of New…

Artese v. Brooklyn Longshoremen's Med. Center

The physician's affirmations submitted in support of the plaintiffs' motion to amend the complaint to include…