Summary
In Constant v. University of Rochester (supra; also same case 111 N.Y. 604) the plaintiff sought to establish the validity of a prior unrecorded mortgage as against defendant's subsequent mortgage which was first duly recorded.
Summary of this case from Ochenkowski v. DunajOpinion
Argued March 15, 1892
Decided May 24, 1892
Martin W. Cooke for appellant.
John E. Parsons for respondents.
MAYNARD, J., reads for reversal.
All concur, except ANDREWS, GRAY and O'BRIEN, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment reversed.