From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Consol. Edison Solutions, Inc. v. Pytluk

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2012
91 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-31

CONSOLIDATED EDISON SOLUTIONS, INC., respondent, v. Jack PYTLUK, individually and doing business as Harp Marketing, appellant.

Weiner & Strauss, Nanuet, N.Y. (Frank Lagano of counsel), for appellant. Meltzer & Pravetz, LLP, New Rochelle, N.Y. (Michael Meltzer of counsel), for respondent.


Weiner & Strauss, Nanuet, N.Y. (Frank Lagano of counsel), for appellant. Meltzer & Pravetz, LLP, New Rochelle, N.Y. (Michael Meltzer of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and on an account stated, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated January 11, 2010, which granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, ENG and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Consol. Edison Solutions, Inc. v. Pytluk

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2012
91 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Consol. Edison Solutions, Inc. v. Pytluk

Case Details

Full title:CONSOLIDATED EDISON SOLUTIONS, INC., respondent, v. Jack PYTLUK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

91 A.D.3d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 745
937 N.Y.S.2d 596

Citing Cases

Bashian & Farber, LLP v. Syms

uded on the ground that an agreement did not occur because there was a dispute regarding the correctness of…