From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connecticut Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. Napert-Boyer Partnership

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Oct 6, 1992
614 A.2d 494 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992)

Opinion

(11132)

Argued September 15, 1992

Decision released October 6, 1992

Action to foreclose two mortgages on certain of the defendants' real property, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New London, where the court, Hurley, J., granted the motion to substitute the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as the plaintiff; thereafter, the court rendered judgment of strict foreclosure; subsequently, the court denied the defendant George K. Boyer's motion to set aside the judgment, and the named defendant et al. appealed to this court. Affirmed.

Raymond L. Baribeault, Jr., with whom, on the brief, was Andrew Brand, for the appellants (named defendant et al.).

Jeanine M. Dumont, with whom was Robert M. Barrack, for the appellee (plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation).


Our review of the record, briefs and arguments convinces us that the judgment should be affirmed.


Summaries of

Connecticut Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. Napert-Boyer Partnership

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Oct 6, 1992
614 A.2d 494 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992)
Case details for

Connecticut Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. Napert-Boyer Partnership

Case Details

Full title:CONNECTICUT BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, N.A. v. NAPERT-BOYER PARTNERSHIP ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 6, 1992

Citations

614 A.2d 494 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992)
614 A.2d 494

Citing Cases

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer Partnership

In 1991, the FDIC obtained a judgment of strict foreclosure on the $1 million second mortgage, which was…